Willem Brouwer has been appointed as the new international member of the Vetting Commission

Willem Brouwer has been appointed as a member of the Commission for the external evaluation of the ethical and financial integrity of judges and candidates for the office of judge of the Supreme Court of Justice. A draft resolution to this effect was approved by 63 deputies.

Willem Brouwer's candidacy was put forward by development partners following the resignation of Maria Giuliana Civinini from this position. According to his CV, Willem Brouwer has been involved in the external evaluation of judges and prosecutors in Albania. Previously, he served as Vice President of the Eulex Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo and as a judge at the Supreme Court in Pristina, Kosovo.

The External Evaluation Commission for Judges and Judge Candidates of the Supreme Court of Justice consists of six members, three proposed by parliamentary factions and three by development partners. Commission members are appointed by Parliament with the approval of 3/5 of the elected deputies.

‍

Press release of the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova

‍

Willem Brouwer has been appointed as the new international member of the Vetting Commission

Subscribe for notifications.

Other press releases

50 completed evaluations by the Vetting Commission: The most common reasons for failure

A new candidate has been referred to the Vetting Commission for evaluation

The Vetting Commission has completed the evaluation of all candidates received under law on pre-vetting

Judicial candidate for SCM to represent the Courts of Appeal fails integrity evaluation

Vetting Commission initiates evaluation of the Courts of Appeal in Bălți, Cahul, and Comrat

SCJ Vetting: Report on evaluation failure for a sitting Supreme Court Judge

Judges from the Courts of Appeal in Cahul, Comrat and Bălți are the next to be evaluated by the Vetting Commission

Evaluation completed for all candidates in the two specialized judicial boards

Two candidates for the Disciplinary Board of Judges received their evaluation results

Evaluation completed for one candidate to the Supreme Court of Justice and four candidates for membership in the specialized boards of judges

Details on the management of information gathered by the Commission in the evaluation process

They passed the evaluation and can access positions in the specialized Boards of the SCM

HEARINGS scheduled for 16 - 19 September 2024

A judge withdrew from the competition for the position of member of the Disciplinary Board of Judges

The chairman of the Vetting Commission participated at the Justice Reform and Anti-Corruption Forum

Notifications of hearing participation – September 2024

Key aspects regarding the operation of the panels in evaluating certain categories of judges

Formation of Evaluation Panels in Accordance with Law 252/2023

Judge Andrei Cazacicov has passed the external evaluation by the Vetting Commission

Evaluation decisions regarding three candidates for the SCM and one candidate for the Disciplinary Board

Activity of the Vetting Commission in FIGURES

Two SCJ candidates and three candidates for the Evaluation and Selection Board of Judges passed the external evaluation

Notice regarding the conduct of a hearing after a previous postponement

Two candidates for the Disciplinary Board of Judges heard by the Vetting Commission

Information pertaining to the hearings conducted by the Vetting Commission on June 11th

Notice concerning the rescheduling of a hearing

The Vetting Commission will conduct hearings from 11 to 13 June 2024

Evaluation Report of the SCJ candidate, Alexandru Rotari, sent to the SCM for examination

Several judges and lawyers, subjects of external evaluation, have been invited to hearings by the Vetting Commission

Judge Ion Talpa passed the evaluation of the Vetting Commission

One more candidate for membership in the Evaluation and Selection Board of Judges passed the external evaluation

Evaluation completed for three candidates to the SCJ and one sitting SCJ judge

SCM candidate, Sergiu Băieșu, passed the external evaluation

Half of the judges of the Chișinău Court of Appeal have chosen to be evaluated by the Vetting Commission

Commission decision on simultaneous recusal requests for four members in an SCJ judge evaluation

Changes to the Vetting Commission's hearing schedule on April 29th

Vetting of the judicial self-governing bodies: Hearings in candidate evaluation process

HEARINGS on 25 to 29 of April 2024

Two candidates for Evaluation and Selection Board of Judges, passed by the Vetting Commission

Vetting of Courts of Appeal starts with the evaluation of the Chisinau Court of Appeal

Vetting Commission completed the integrity evaluation of subjects Vladislav Gribincea and Mihaela Pascal

Media notice regarding examination of a recusal

Dumitru Racoviță, the first judge positively assessed for Evaluation and Selection Board for Judges

Reports on the evaluation of the candidates to the SCJ, Irina Iacub and Svetlana Balmuș, sent to the SCM for examination

Candidate to the SCM, Tatiana Tabuncic, passed the external evaluation

Vetting Commission presents its first progress report to Parliament

Details on the intention to resign of an international member of the Vetting Commission

One more judge, candidate to the Disciplinary Board, will be assessed for integrity by the Vetting Commission

The rules according to which judges of courts of appeal, presidents and vice-presidents of courts and other subjects will be evaluated have been approved,Law 252/2023

Reports on the evaluation of the candidates to the SCJ, Ion Munteanu and Stella Bleșceaga, sent to the SCM

They have been notified that the external evaluation of their financial and ethical integrity begins

Announcement regarding the rearrangement of the hearing of SCM Board candidate, Ghenadie Mîra

The reports on the evaluation of the SCJ candidates, Adrian Cerbu and Diana Stănilă, were sent to the SCM for examination

One more candidate for SCJ, accepted by the SCM based on the report of the Vetting Commission

Vetting Commission hearing schedule for 20 and 22 March

The Vetting Commission proposes to the SCM that judge Stela Procopciuc passes the evaluation

One more candidate for evaluation to represent courts of appeal in the SCM

Announcement on the refusal of a candidate for the SCJ to attend the hearing

Notice concerning the rescheduling of a hearing

The acting president of the Court of Appeal Chișinău, Ghenadie Mîra, was invited by the Vetting Commission to the hearing

Notice issued: Attendance expected for the hearings

The Vetting Commission completed the evaluation of Ion Buruiană for the SCJ and submitted its report to the SCM

Vetting Commission hearing schedule for 12 - 14 March

The Superior Council of Magistracy approved two more Vetting Commission reports

Seven subjects of the external evaluation were invited to hearings

The candidates for the SCJ and SCM Boards with no integrity doubt have successfully completed the stage of public hearings

The Vetting Commission completed the evaluation of Mihail Lvovschi for the SCJ. The decision of the SCM follows

Details of the Vetting Commission hearings on 4 March

SCM has accepted the Vetting Commission's report regarding the evaluation of prosecutor Sergiu Brigai, a candidate for the SCJ

Hearing notices sent to seven subjects under evaluation, with no integrity doubts

Vetting of SCJ: Two reports with proposals for promotion of the evaluation sent to the SCM for consideration

Vetting Commission publishes report on the evaluation of candidate Viorica Puica for the position of judge at the Supreme Court of Justice

Eleven candidates to the SCJ and to the SCM Boards have been notified regarding the initiation of the evaluation procedure

The evaluation report on Supreme Court Judge Aliona Miron is now public

The Vetting Commission's report regarding the evaluation of the acting SCJ judge Aliona Miron has been accepted by the SCM

New candidates for the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) and the specialized boards of the SCM, submitted to be evaluated by the Vetting Commission

Statement from the Vetting Commission on its Role and Independence